On Cloudmonster vs Adidas Superstar II vs Nike Dunk – Performance, Style & Suitability Compared
When selecting the right sneaker, it’s important to consider more than just how it looks. Do you need high-performance running tech, timeless streetwear style, or cultural versatility? Each of these models brings something unique to the table. The On Cloudmonster is engineered for high cushion and performance, the Adidas Superstar II delivers heritage street credibility, and the Nike Dunk Low combines basketball origins with skate and lifestyle crossover. Let’s explore how these three stack up across design, performance, comfort, and everyday wear.
1. Design & Purpose
On Cloudmonster is built by Swiss brand On Running with the runner in mind. It features oversized CloudTec® cushioning pods, a rocker geometry, and Helion™ superfoam to deliver a springy, propulsive ride. It’s designed for road running, long distances, and serious training sessions. (On)
In contrast, the Adidas Superstar II emerged from basketball heritage (late 1960s/70s) and became a streetwear icon. Its signature shell toe, full-grain leather upper, and three-stripe design make it instantly recognizable. It’s less about high performance and more about style, durability, and cultural relevance. (PRM)
The Nike Dunk Low blends basketball roots with skate and streetwear appeal. It includes a complete leather upper (in many versions), foam midsole cushioning, and a classic rubber cupsole with herringbone traction. It’s versatile for daily wear, skating, and urban lifestyle. (Nike.com)
2. Comfort & Performance
| Model | Cushioning & Tech | Best Use Case | Fit / Feel Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| On Cloudmonster | Max cushioning: large CloudTec pods, Helion™ foam, 6mm drop. (REI) | Daily training, long runs, performance | Some reviewers mention roomy feel and unique ride. (Reddit) |
| Adidas Superstar II | Standard cupsole with leather upper, shell toe protection. (PRM) | Everyday wear, street style, casual use | Fit may run roomy in toe box; heritage feel. (Reddit) |
| Nike Dunk Low | Foam midsole, rubber outsole for traction; less advanced cushioning than dedicated running shoes. (Nike.com) | Lifestyle, casual walking, skating | Classic fit; comfort adequate for daily use. |
From this table:
-
If your priority is high-performance running and maximal cushioning, the Cloudmonster clearly leads.
-
For fashion-forward daily wear with durability and heritage style, the Superstar II is compelling.
-
For versatile everyday use with strong lifestyle credentials, the Dunk Low bridges style and practicality.
3. Style, Longevity & Sustainability
Style and durability are vital when you decide which sneaker to buy beyond just performance.
On Cloudmonster brings futuristic styling—bold geometry, large pods, technical aesthetics. It also emphasizes sustainability with recycled polyester and eco-materials. (REI)
Adidas Superstar II has stayed relevant for decades thanks to its timeless silhouette, iconic shell toe, and countless collaborations. It’s built to last as a streetwear staple and many variants include vegan leather or recycled components. (PRM)
Nike Dunk Low continues to dominate sneaker culture with varied colorways, strong resale appeal, and crossover skate/lifestyle credentials. While not performance-running tech, it’s built for everyday comfort and cultural relevance. (Nike.com)
4. Final Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
-
Choose the On Cloudmonster if you’re primarily focused on performance, running, and want advanced cushioning with strong energy return.
-
Choose the Adidas Superstar II if your focus is on style, heritage streetwear, and everyday lifestyle wear with iconic design.
-
Choose the Nike Dunk Low if you want a versatile sneaker that hits cultural style points, works for casual use and skating, and has strong fashion appeal.
In other words: the Cloudmonster is tech-forward, the Superstar II is heritage-forward, and the Dunk Low is culture-forward.